CG talk lighting challenge #4

Please post finished works here.
Locked
Captain Obvious
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: London, UK

CG talk lighting challenge #4

Post by Captain Obvious »

Simple test. Texturing isn't done yet, and neither is lighting. I can't get absorbation to work in Kray, unfortunately, limiting the effect of the glass shading... And all those refractions take a LONG time to render! Also, what the heck are those black squares?
Attachments
OUTPUT00000.jpg
OUTPUT00000.jpg (95.77 KiB) Viewed 5699 times
silverlw
Posts: 453
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:05 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by silverlw »

Wow that could be an interesting shot when it's done. Is all Glasgeomtry singlesided?
Have you turned off FG reflections/refractions? It looks like that since the glass is pretty dark and it shouldnt. Always leave FG trans/refr on. The squares you see is probably a documented bug that i guess comes from caustics that you have enabled or? Thickness based absorbtion isnt implemented in kray yet.
Captain Obvious
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by Captain Obvious »

Reflection/fraction FG rays is turned on. I never turn if off. :p

All surfaces are single-sided.

I didn't use caustics at all.

Thickness-based absorbation is implemented into Kray since the surface thickness gradient works. However, the surface thickness gradient requires air polygons, and air polygons screwed up the refractions. :(


More images:
http://tegelstenclothes.mememachines.ne ... ttles1.png
http://tegelstenclothes.mememachines.ne ... ttles2.png
http://tegelstenclothes.mememachines.ne ... ttles3.jpg
User avatar
Janusz Biela
Posts: 3265
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:39 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Post by Janusz Biela »

Very nice material!
silverlw
Posts: 453
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:05 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by silverlw »

oh and captain, i see you use old 1.611. Try 1.612 wich i dont think have those black little squares bug.
Captain Obvious
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by Captain Obvious »

The other images are rendered in 1.612. I updated after the first render. ;)


Thanks, Johny.
silverlw
Posts: 453
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 7:05 pm
Location: Sweden
Contact:

Post by silverlw »

[quote="Thickness-based absorbation is implemented into Kray since the surface thickness gradient works. However, the surface thickness gradient requires air polygons, and air polygons screwed up the refractions. :(
[/quote]

I havent tried surface thickness in Kray...maybe it actually work's but it will defenitely not work with air polys. Kray does it owns calculations to judge refractions in/out properly. I will see if i can find that glas scene and have a try myself or do you have it already converted for everybody to test? Kray is very fast at rendering glas so maybe you should use more photons? If you have too little and high N-values the interpolation can get really slow.
Captain Obvious
Posts: 165
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:15 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by Captain Obvious »

Weird. On a simple test surface, it works just fine without air polygons. In the bottle scene, it didn't work at all... I'll get back to you on this.
User avatar
gtanski
Site Admin
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 1:43 pm
Location: Poland

Re: CG talk lighting challenge #4

Post by gtanski »

If I have this scene or other scene with black squares I could fix that easy.
davide
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jun 23, 2006 9:48 am

Post by davide »

It happens to me also.
I have check the models and found some 2p polygons...
Hope its help,
Davide
Locked