what we should be looking forward for?

General disscusion about Kray
jdomingo
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:39 am

what we should be looking forward for?

Post by jdomingo »

just bored today, there are a lot of new rendering engine coming up this year. some GPU powered some claiming the fastest ever.
so what we should be looking forward for kray?
jure
Posts: 2142
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 6:53 pm

Re: what we should be looking forward for?

Post by jure »

Well in short: there are improvements planned in all fronts.
Kray team has been listening to requests all the time and gathered them into a long list. GPU is certainly something high on the list.
- Jure
User avatar
larry_g1s
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:48 am
Location: California
Contact:

Re: what we should be looking forward for?

Post by larry_g1s »

Real-time previewer. 8)
Larry V

Romans 1:16
For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it is
the power of God to salvation for everyone who believes.
User avatar
khan973
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:58 pm

Re: what we should be looking forward for?

Post by khan973 »

A VPR would be awesome!
Kray LW and Fprime don't render the same way so it's really long to get the desired results.
A VPR would help us to work twice faster
geo_n
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 3:01 pm
Location: jpn

Re: what we should be looking forward for?

Post by geo_n »

Since core has a great IPR system and lw 9.6 already has fprime, I think kray should focus on the weakest features. Vray has been succesfull even without an IPR for many years. But it is well integrated to its host app.
Like lw is weak in character work, kray is weak in compositing workflow. Better integration inside lw so we can do animation and compositing.

OT. I just tried octane renderer and for 99 euros its quite a powerhouse. But I don't know how they claim it could do animation. Maybe do animation that you can't composite afterwards which is unheard of in standard workflow. There's no rendermanagment and renderlayers. Anyway its alpha but no doubt the renderer is good and I would pick it up if I were an arhiviz person that needs an unbiased renderer.
User avatar
larry_g1s
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:48 am
Location: California
Contact:

Re: what we should be looking forward for?

Post by larry_g1s »

geo_n wrote:Since core has a great IPR system and lw 9.6 already has fprime, I think kray should focus on the weakest features. Vray has been succesfull even without an IPR for many years. But it is well integrated to its host app.
Like lw is weak in character work, kray is weak in compositing workflow. Better integration inside lw so we can do animation and compositing.
I agree Core's VPR/IPR is very very nice. But as Khan pointed out, each engine renders different and setup is different. An IPR for the render engine one is going to use for output, in this case Kray, is a huge advantage.
Larry V

Romans 1:16
For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it is
the power of God to salvation for everyone who believes.
geo_n
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 3:01 pm
Location: jpn

Re: what we should be looking forward for?

Post by geo_n »

I'm not against IPR for kray. Would be a welcome edition.
But priorities would be good to list down. My list
1. light and object relation in kray I think is priority
2. matt options support atleast, for compositing.
3. microdisplacement
4. renderlayers - a bit tricky but I can do it manually with scene editor and break out scenes. I bet janus does this automatically by turning off attributes in scene editor and also doing automated tasks per object attribute to turn on off shadows, etc.
Why lw doesn't have this I don't know.
User avatar
Janusz Biela
Posts: 3265
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:39 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: what we should be looking forward for?

Post by Janusz Biela »

geo_n wrote:I'm not against IPR for kray. Would be a welcome edition.
But priorities would be good to list down. My list
1. light and object relation in kray I think is priority
2. matt options support atleast, for compositing.
3. microdisplacement
4. renderlayers - a bit tricky but I can do it manually with scene editor and break out scenes. I bet janus does this automatically by turning off attributes in scene editor and also doing automated tasks per object attribute to turn on off shadows, etc.
Why lw doesn't have this I don't know.

This is my list:
1/ Update engine GI
2/ New Instance (by textures with layers)
3/ Displacement
4/ Curve correction (maybe realtime)
User avatar
khan973
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:58 pm

Re: what we should be looking forward for?

Post by khan973 »

+ Integration of some Tailer commands to the UI
+ Some Camera options like exposure, overburn, or stuff like that
jdomingo
Posts: 144
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:39 am

Re: what we should be looking forward for?

Post by jdomingo »

my wish list are:

1.physical camera (like in v-ray or fry or maxwell)
2.better instancing
3.better physical sky (i mean more tweakable)
4.physical material ( im just making this up since a lot out there going physical thingy)

still keep UI simple but kick ass result :)
geo_n
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 3:01 pm
Location: jpn

Re: what we should be looking forward for?

Post by geo_n »

Any updates for kray soon?
I forgot about animateable sun system :mrgreen:
About physical material, vray has yet to switch the way the materials are made, simplicity is effective and fast and some things are better not seen by the artist making things transparent. I wonder if vray would change when 3dmax goes nodal.
I was going to buy octane render because its 99euro only but when I tested it and played with the materials, it was tedious. Its physical material but its not the way I remember maxwell did it. Anyone buy it?
User avatar
3dworks
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 11:25 am
Location: Berlin
Contact:

Re: what we should be looking forward for?

Post by 3dworks »

my top wish list includes:

* the support of lights exclusion lists for a better compatibility with LW /fprime scenes
* a command for setting GI bounces independently from RT depth
* support of shadermeister
* kray settings as metadata in image formats supporting it
* openEXR support
* save also partially rendered images

cheers

markus
geo_n
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 3:01 pm
Location: jpn

Re: what we should be looking forward for?

Post by geo_n »

Yes the light and object relation should be priority indeed.
Isn't shadermeister a shader? I think jure explained kray will never support shaders just like fprime.
soth3d
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 10:27 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: what we should be looking forward for?

Post by soth3d »

3dworks wrote:* openEXR support
+1
Is it possible to use EXRTrader with KRay?
Cheers
Tomek
GarageFarm.NET
We are the cheapest render farm! 260 nodes and still growing!

Skype: garage.farm
geo_n
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 3:01 pm
Location: jpn

Re: what we should be looking forward for?

Post by geo_n »

So kray will get new render engine soon as posted by johny.:)
Hope it rocks and released soon.
I took the bite and bought octane and its something kray needs to look at to get ideas, etc.
Octane is rendering animation, flickerfree lighting and shadows like fprime but at very high speed.
http://vimeo.com/13148492
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9FaZRwqROE
http://vimeo.com/12946952
http://vimeo.com/13084273

And the winners
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qL_soGzJ ... r_embedded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AgnaEVQy ... r_embedded
http://vimeo.com/13088611
http://vimeo.com/13100212

Stills competitions
http://www.refractivesoftware.com/forum ... =16&t=2657

Impressive for a short development time imho.
Locked