Nordic center Planica

Please post finished works here.
Locked
medzo
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:04 pm

Nordic center Planica

Post by medzo »

Hi
I would like to share with you a project I just finished.

http://vimeo.com/23804388
jure
Posts: 2142
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 6:53 pm

Re: Nordic center Planica

Post by jure »

Awesome! Nice camera work and nice comping! Congrats!
- Jure
User avatar
Janusz Biela
Posts: 3265
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:39 am
Location: Finland
Contact:

Re: Nordic center Planica

Post by Janusz Biela »

Great WORK :!: :!: :!: :shock:
User avatar
khan973
Posts: 296
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:58 pm

Re: Nordic center Planica

Post by khan973 »

Really nice!
It just bothers me when cameras have motions they wouldn't have in real life (event with helico, or crane).
It gives a 3D feeling.
User avatar
salvatore
Posts: 406
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 1:36 pm

Re: Nordic center Planica

Post by salvatore »

to me too fast camera motion :evil:
confusing :evil:
User avatar
3dworks
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 11:25 am
Location: Berlin
Contact:

Re: Nordic center Planica

Post by 3dworks »

nice project, great animations and stills! do you mind to share a few 'snow' tricks? procedurals? nodes?

cheers

markus
thomas
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 9:59 am

Re: Nordic center Planica

Post by thomas »

Wow! Amazing work! Congratulations!

I like the fast camera motions in a way, because they make the movie very dynamic and inspiring. The problem is that they are so perfectly smooth that they indeed give away the 3D nature of the images, which gives the whole scene a feel of looking at a scale model (instead of something in it's real life size). At least I think this is why I'm getting the feeling of looking at a scale model instead of a big mountain.

If you'd speed up helicopter shot footage in the same way, the slow jittering of the helicopter flight would be sped up into a more noticeable jitter or camera shake in some parts, which might look more realistic.

But to be honest, I don't care too much about that. Photorealism is not the goal here in the sense that people can't know that it is rendered. I'm assuming people seeing this will know that it's a visualisation of a project that still needs to be built, and it captures a good sense of excitement as well as showing the look of the finished site and buildings, so A+ from me!

Thomas
Locked