Re: Octane quick test-drive
Posted: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:32 pm
...anyway these examples above are senseless (include my). To find real speed of render you need real complex scene. Path Tracing is very, very slow - please DO NOT BELIEVE magic!. Is doesn`t matter dual Xeon or dual GTX still slow and horrible nosy. Why my maximum level of GI quality is Photon Mapping + QMC (this is maximum level in my opinion...really you do not need Path Tracing at all) or less quality but still not so bad pure Final Gathering.
Normal interior scene on Octane, Maxwell and similar renders in Full HD takes 5-10 h...and is no way to do it faster. Please consider that, Path Tracing get very slow calculations (VERY) when you add more bounces (really you need minimum 7-10 to get rid of artificially in GI) reflection/blur, fur, many lights, instances. Tricks with only Direct Light + Occlusion in these software are senseless.
What people need now (95% of users) is good Final Gathering engine + good shaders then renders are under 20 min in Full HD with high quality.
Also animation is pointless in Path Tracing engines. Noise automatically kick you out from this department or if you are stubborn you can wait (watch graph above with noise).
On the web are a lot very good renders from these software but please think: horrible time, good hardware, post process, good design, good artistic point of view. Statistic user get headache to see that but reality is tough: engine is just small part of that.
Here nice article about Corona/V-ray (Corona is hybrid of Path Tracing and QMC or even Final Gathering):
http://3d-graf.blogspot.fi/2014/11/vray-corona.html
PS
Personally I do not like GPU rendering. Running 2-3 GPU cards with almost 1000 Watt total power consumption of whole computer give me headache. Power supply for whole hardware must be also top one. Heating from all GPU cards has influence for your room (if is small) and also...what nobody write down for you motherboard (electronics components). Too extreme for me and still for rendering bigger projects I need CPU.
But is not so bad because I would be happy have two Titanium-Z with minimum 12 Giga GPU RAM because then rendering in Path Tracing has sense. Under that: forget.
Normal interior scene on Octane, Maxwell and similar renders in Full HD takes 5-10 h...and is no way to do it faster. Please consider that, Path Tracing get very slow calculations (VERY) when you add more bounces (really you need minimum 7-10 to get rid of artificially in GI) reflection/blur, fur, many lights, instances. Tricks with only Direct Light + Occlusion in these software are senseless.
What people need now (95% of users) is good Final Gathering engine + good shaders then renders are under 20 min in Full HD with high quality.
Also animation is pointless in Path Tracing engines. Noise automatically kick you out from this department or if you are stubborn you can wait (watch graph above with noise).
On the web are a lot very good renders from these software but please think: horrible time, good hardware, post process, good design, good artistic point of view. Statistic user get headache to see that but reality is tough: engine is just small part of that.
Here nice article about Corona/V-ray (Corona is hybrid of Path Tracing and QMC or even Final Gathering):
http://3d-graf.blogspot.fi/2014/11/vray-corona.html
PS
Personally I do not like GPU rendering. Running 2-3 GPU cards with almost 1000 Watt total power consumption of whole computer give me headache. Power supply for whole hardware must be also top one. Heating from all GPU cards has influence for your room (if is small) and also...what nobody write down for you motherboard (electronics components). Too extreme for me and still for rendering bigger projects I need CPU.
But is not so bad because I would be happy have two Titanium-Z with minimum 12 Giga GPU RAM because then rendering in Path Tracing has sense. Under that: forget.
